Regulation A+ Could Go to the Head of the Class

By Eliza Sporn Fromberg – 

On March 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules implementing Title IV of the JOBS Act by adopting amendments to Regulation A. This new and improved version of Regulation A, which provides an exemption from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, for private companies raising up to $50 million in a 12-month period, is commonly referred to as “Regulation A+.” The final rules address several of the limitations of the current Regulation A, including the low dollar threshold and the requirement to comply with state blue sky laws. Regulation A+ may offer an attractive alternative to conducting a private placement pursuant to Regulation D or making an initial public offering for companies seeking to raise capital.

Regulation A+ will provide for two tiers of offerings. Under Tier 1, an issuer may offer and sell up to $20 million within a 12-month period (including up to $6 million by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer). Under Tier 2, an issuer may offer and sell up to $50 million within a 12-month period (including up to $15 million by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer). Only U.S. and Canadian companies that are not required to file reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are eligible to offer or sell securities under Regulation A+. A company’s existing security-holders may sell securities in reliance on Regulation A+, subject to certain limitations. Selling security-holders cannot sell more than 30 percent of the aggregate offering in the issuer’s first Regulation A+ offering and in any subsequent Regulation A+ offering for 12 months following the initial offering. An issuer can choose whether to conduct a Tier 1 or Tier 2 offering for offerings up to $20 million.

While issuers opting for Tier 2 offerings can raise significant amounts of capital, Regulation A+ imposes a number of reporting and disclosure requirements on companies conducting Tier 2 offerings. Those requirements include (1) inclusion of audited financial statements in the offering circular and annually, and (2) annual, semiannual and current event reporting. In addition, nonaccredited investors must limit purchases to no more than 10 percent of the greater of the investor’s annual income or net worth. This investment limit does not apply if the securities are to be listed on a national securities exchange at the consummation of the offering. Companies seeking capital will need to determine whether the opportunity to raise funds from a larger and more diverse group of investors rather than in a private placement offered via general solicitation (wherein all purchasers must be accredited investors) outweighs the disclosure and reporting requirements of Regulation A+.

Notably, state securities law registration and qualification requirements are preempted in Tier 2 offerings, as all investors in Tier 2 offerings will be considered “qualified purchasers.” The final rule defines qualified purchaser to include any person to whom securities are offered or sold in a Tier 2 offering. Tier 1 offerings will continue to be subject to both federal and state oversight, although the coordinated review program for Regulation A offerings instituted by the North American Securities Administrators Association may alleviate some of the burden.

Also easing the regulatory burden on issuers, securities issued in a Tier 2 offering will be exempt from the “holder of record” calculation for purposes of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act if the issuer remains subject to, and is current in, its Regulation A+ periodic reporting obligations, engages a transfer agent registered with the SEC, and has a public float of less than $75 million or annual revenues less than $50 million. Short-Form 8-A registration remains an option for issuers, especially those looking to become listed on a national securities exchange.

The final rule includes bad actor disqualifications that are substantially the same as those included in Rule 506(d). The covered person’s status for the purpose of the disqualification is tested at the time of filing the offering statement.

Regulation A+ becomes effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.


Eliza Sporn Fromberg’s practice concentrates on advising broker-dealers, investment advisers, boutique investment banks, and private funds on regulatory, compliance, and transactional matters. She provides advice to clients on handling day-to-day compliance matters, addressing new legislative and regulatory developments, and enhancing their policies and procedures.

Eliza Sporn Fromberg, Attorney: New York, NY – Day Pitney LLP / Lawyers




This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at [...]

NPRAfter Outcry, Crowdfunding Site Patreon Backs Off Plan To Raise ...NPRThe popular crowdfunding service Patreon has backed off plans to change its payment structure, after widespread, vocal and passionate opposition from creators and their fans. Last week, the site announced it woul [...]

TechCrunchHow hate speech crowdfunding outfit Hatreon crept back online ...TechCrunchIf you want to make a living creating white supremacist content, you're probably not going to do it via sites like Kickstarter and Patreon, which prohibit hate speech. Fortunately there's Ha [...]

CoinDeskKickstarter ICO? Don't Count On It Says Crowdfunding Leader ...CoinDeskThe company most widely associated with crowdfunding, Brooklyn-based Kickstarter, has no plans to get into the initial coin offering (ICO) business. Coming in response to the news yesterday that compet [...]

CryptoCoinsNewsCrowdfunding Giant Indiegogo Looks to Make ICOs Mainstream ...CryptoCoinsNewsOne of the world's most popular crowdfunding platforms is getting in on the ICO game. Josiah Wilmoth on 14/12/2017. ------------------Advertisement------------------. Advertisement · Reddi [...]

ForbesCrowdfunding Do's And Dont's From iFundWomen's Karen CahnForbesDuring our conversation, she was transparent in sharing that her first software company, VProud, failed because she “did everything backwards” and spent too much time trying to perfect the product. “Pe [...]

Crowdfunding via Customers: Is This The New Startup Capital?Customer ThinkWith more and more companies in a variety of sectors developing new crowdfunding campaigns, it makes sense to ask whether crowdfunding is likely to replace startup capital in the near future. Crowdfunding is qui [...]

VentureBeatAtaribox hits the pause button on its crowdfunding campaignVentureBeatAtari was supposed to start taking preorders along with launching its crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo today for its new Ataribox console. However, it seems to have hit an unspecified snag and in an ema [...]

Coindesk (press release) (blog)Crowdfunding Giant Indiegogo Opens to ICOs - CoinDeskCoindesk (press release) (blog)The startup revealed today that, through an existing partnership with MicroVentures, it will begin offering services to projects seek to use the blockchain funding model. [...]

TechCrunchFormer Gawker employees are crowdfunding an effort to buy Gawker.comTechCrunchWhile Univision acquired most of Gawker Media's sites last year (and renamed them as the Gizmodo Media Group), the deal didn't include Gawker itself. In fact, BuzzFeed reported last month [...]

CFB Finance


  • Crowdfunding
  • Crowdfund
  • Peer to Peer Lending
  • FinTech
  • Reg A+
  • Reg CF
  • Crowdfunding USA

Press Release

Live Crowdfunding .tv

What's Next Step in Regulation A+ JOBS ACTS Title IIII :L Interview : Steve Cinelli with Brian Korn Securities and Crowdfunding/Peer-to-Peer Lending Lawyer, Watch more video library | Conference | Interview | Campaign Showcase | Research | Education |