Special Report on Equity Crowdfunding Investment Results : RealCrowd

 CrowdfundBeat Special Report, 

By Mark Robertson,

This is the second in a series of blog post about returns and tax implications from my crowdfunding investments from 2014.  The first post was about my four investments from Realty Mogul.  Today’s post is about my five investments with Real Crowd.  All of Real Crowd’s projects have meet or exceeded expectations and pro-formas.

Note – Distributions are paid quarterly, 4-8 weeks after each quarter.  All my investments were made in 2014, so I did not receive 4 distributions  in calender year 2014 for each investment.

INVESTMENT 1 – Fort Davis Center Washington, DC

This was my first ever real estate crowdfunding investment.  I dipped my toes into crowdfunding in December of 2013. Fort Davis is an office/retail center located in Washington DC sponsored by Atlas Real Estate Partners. The project has an 8% preferred return with a 65/35 split thereafter. It was projected to have an average 12% cash on cash return and an 18% IRR.

Results – Cash distributions were slightly less than projected cash on cash return of 10.5% for 2014.  However, they exceeded their underwritten projections each quarter. Several new leases were signed over the year as well. New lease rates were projected in the mid $20’s and they were able to achieve rental rates in the mid $30’s

Tax consequences –For every $10,000 invested $843 was paid out in 2014.  The K1 (after depreciation etc.) reports a loss of $1121 for each $10,000 invested. The net effect for investor in a combined 40% tax bracket is $843 is tax deferred “dividends” and $448 decrease in is taxes owed from the reported “loss”.

investing-charts

Investment 2 – Hillcrest Apartments Durango CO

This investment from January of 2014 has performed better than projected. This 3-5 year hold of a 112 unit apartment community was estimated to have a cash on cash yield starting at 8-10% with an IRR of 14-17%.

Results – Cash distributions rose form 8% to 9.2% during the year. Operating income beat projections by over 15% by the end of the year.

Tax consequences – For every $10,000 invested $650 was paid out in distributions during 2014. The K1 (after depreciation etc.) reports a gain of $2 for each $10,000 invested. The net effect for investor in a combined 40% tax bracket is $650 is tax deferred “dividends” and $1 increase in is taxes owed from the reported “gain”.

Investment 3 – MLG Fund

This investment from February of 2014 is going according to plan. The Wisconsin diversified real estate fund was projected to have a7-10% cash on cash return in year one and an average cash on cash return of 10.24%.  The projected IRR for the 5 year hold is 15%.

Results – Distributions during 2014 were at 7% which are at the low end of projections. However, they did announce the sale of an asset in the first quarter of 2015. The return on equity from this sale was over 100%. They plan on returning over 30% of our capital while we still maintain our ownership percentage in the fund’s assets.  100% return (on a portion of the investment) in less than a year is my definition of a good return.

Tax consequences – For every $10,000 invested $472 was paid out in distributions during 2014. The K1 (after depreciation etc.) reports a loss of $203 for each $10,000 invested. The net effect for investor in a combined 40% tax bracket is $472 is tax deferred “dividends” and $82 decrease in is taxes owed from the reported “loss”.

Investment 4 – Slauson Industrial Development Los Angeles

This investment from May of 2014 has performed as projected. The opportunistic ground up development had a projected IRR of 18-20%.  The 2 year project is for an industrial building in Los Angeles

Results – There were no distribution planed or made during 2014.  They state that the project is on budget and on time.

Tax consequences – For every $10,000 invested $0 was paid out in distributions during 2014. (as expected) The K1 (after depreciation etc.) reports a loss of $0 for each $10,000 invested. The net effect for investor in a combined 40% tax bracket is $0 is tax deferred “dividends” and $0 decrease in is taxes owed from the reported “loss”.

Investment 5 – Northwood Apartments Jacksonville, FL

This investment from Sept of 2014 has performed in line with projections. This 3-5 year hold of a 112 unit apartment community was estimated to have a cash on cash yield starting at 10.75% and an IRR of 15%.

Results – There were no cash distributions because of the timing of the investment. They have meet or beat there operating income projections each month.

Tax consequences – For every $10,000 invested $0 was paid out in distributions during 2014. The K1 (after depreciation etc.) reports a gain of $145 for each $10,000 invested. The net effect for investor in a combined 40% tax bracket is $145 is taxable “dividends” and $58 increase in is taxes owed from the reported “gain”.

HEADLINE NEWS

This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news [...]

NPRAfter Outcry, Crowdfunding Site Patreon Backs Off Plan To Raise FeesNPRThe popular crowdfunding service Patreon has backed off plans to change its payment structure, after widespread, vocal and passionate opposition from creators and their fans. Last week, the site announced it wou [...]

CoinDeskKickstarter ICO? Don't Count On It Says Crowdfunding Leader ...CoinDeskThe company most widely associated with crowdfunding, Brooklyn-based Kickstarter, has no plans to get into the initial coin offering (ICO) business. Coming in response to the news yesterday that compet [...]

TechCrunchHow hate speech crowdfunding outfit Hatreon crept back online ...TechCrunchIf you want to make a living creating white supremacist content, you're probably not going to do it via sites like Kickstarter and Patreon, which prohibit hate speech. Fortunately there's Ha [...]

Coindesk (press release) (blog)Crowdfunding Giant Indiegogo Opens to ICOs - CoinDeskCoindesk (press release) (blog)The startup revealed today that, through an existing partnership with MicroVentures, it will begin offering services to projects seek to use the blockchain funding model. [...]

HuffPostIs Crowdfunding Really a Good Idea for Innovation?HuffPostHere's a head-scratcher for you: according to new research, if you refer to your product or idea as both “novel” and “useful” in your crowdfunding campaign, your funding will be lower than it would if you just decl [...]

ForbesCrowdfunding Do's And Dont's From iFundWomen's Karen CahnForbesDuring our conversation, she was transparent in sharing that her first software company, VProud, failed because she “did everything backwards” and spent too much time trying to perfect the product. “Pe [...]

FortuneWant to Hold Your Own ICO? Indiegogo Can Help You With ThatFortuneCrowdfunding sites like Kickstarter (kickstarter, +0.00%) and Indiegogo raised start-up cash for a generation of online entrepreneurs, but one increasingly visible method of internet-sourced financing seemed to h [...]

TechCrunchFormer Gawker employees are crowdfunding an effort to buy Gawker.comTechCrunchWhile Univision acquired most of Gawker Media's sites last year (and renamed them as the Gizmodo Media Group), the deal didn't include Gawker itself. In fact, BuzzFeed reported last month [...]

Boing BoingGawker alumni are crowdfunding to outbid Peter Thiel for control of ...Boing BoingGawker was bankrupted by Peter Thiel, who secretly backed Hulk Hogan's lawsuit against the network of news, entertainment and gossip sites in an act of petty revenge. Now, Gawker's a [...]

CFB Finance

Marketwired

  • Crowdfunding
  • Crowdfund
  • Peer to Peer Lending
  • FinTech
  • Reg A+
  • Reg CF
  • Crowdfunding USA

Press Release

Live Crowdfunding .tv

What's Next Step in Regulation A+ JOBS ACTS Title IIII :L Interview : Steve Cinelli with Brian Korn Securities and Crowdfunding/Peer-to-Peer Lending Lawyer, Watch more video library | Conference | Interview | Campaign Showcase | Research | Education |