Fact Sheet on Jobs Act Title IV – Regulation A+

CrowdFundBeat News Wire,

Brief Background

Three years ago the JOBS Act was promulgated into law by Congress and approved by President Obama on 5th of April, 2012. While execution of the JOBS Act was significantly delayed by regulators at the SEC, The Title II of the JOBS Act was the starting portion of equity crowd-funding legislation enforced in September of 2013. These sections of the equity crowd-funding laws permitted the issuer for public advertising of campaign for fundraising. But, it restricted the right to invest to Accredited Investors and ignored normal investor out in the cold.

In the very first year of equity crowd-funding permitted under Title II, new capital market growth of over USD250 million was observed. This amount was raised preliminary from internet sites.

Regulation A under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act, permits issuer of securities to raise an amount up to $5 million through sales of securities in interstate offerings and there is no need to comply with the Securities Act’s registration requirements. Regulation A as it currently prevailing is considered not so appealing way of capital-raising because of the requirements to comply with securities regulations of state and low volume of annual capitalization.

To make it more appealing there was a significant amendment under Title IV of the JOBS Act amends Section 3(b) of the Securities Act. The amendment attempts for increasing the funding limit to $50 million for a Regulation A-style offering (u/s Section 3(b)(2)) and requires the Securities & Exchange Commission to amend Regulation A or adopt a similar regulations. This provision of the Act is unofficially called by practitioners as Regulation A+.

Practical Considerations

Knowing about the advantages of Regulation A+ as compared to revised Rule 506 offering or an EGC public offering will become a little more nuanced after factoring in the availability of scaled disclosures, relaxed communications rules and the availability of general solicitation.

An exempt offering which include a Regulation D offering is subject to few limitations that may not be so advantageous and a registered offering may still be costly and a time consuming effort.. Regulation A+ may provide an efficient way of offering which is quite similar to a registered offering. It might be especially advantageous for an issuing party to consider this offering as a precursor to an IPO.

Although there are many likenesses between a prospectus and an offering circular, you can more easily and simply prepare offering circular than prospectus. One other benefit is that the costs of hiring of external advisors, will be lesser for a Regulation A+ offering. Meanwhile timing is perhaps the most vital determinant of successful achievement of an offering, Regulation A+ may suggest a distinctive advantage.

Other significant benefit is that there is no limitation of investors or offerees under Regulation A+ who can subscribe in the offering. Furthermore there is also no requirement for an offeree to be an accredited investors.

Additional benefits of this offering is that an issuer and underwriter can structure a Regulation A+ offering with more flexibility. The securities issued under this regulation will be freely allowed for trading in the secondary market after the offering without any limits of holding period or without any resale restrictions. This may be important to certain institutional investors that are subject to limitations on investments in restricted securities. Issuer can test the capacity the investors and through Regulation A+, and he may also consider conducting a Regulation S or Regulation D offering after conducting of an offering under Regulation A+.

Crowd Funding exemption

Crowd Funding is an emerging outgrowth of social media that provides the fund raisers an emerging way of funding for their ventures. Crowd Funding normally depends on the ability to contribute cash from individuals who have some sort of a common interest and are also willing to contribute slight contributions into the venture. There is no exemption in SEC registration for crowd funding efforts that involve sales of securities. All such activities of fund raiser are illegal. As a result, an individual or an entity selling securities by way of crowd funding could be subject to potential legal obligations at the state and federal level, and potentially in foreign countries.

Pre-JOBS Act registration exemptions are highly time consuming and unworkable for crowd-funding due to the vast use of the internet. But good news is that the Title III of the JOBS Act through its paragraph (6), added under section Section 4 of the Securities Act that makes crowd funding exempt from registration.

Congress mandated the changes to Regulation A as part of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. The SEC’s Regulation A-Plus not only addresses the money threshold, but also includes issuer eligibility rules, content and filing requirements for offering statements, and ongoing reporting requirements for issuers.


Tiers of Regulation A+

The Regulation A+ permits two tiers of offerings. Tier 1 typically similar to the current Regulation A, but can allow up to and amount of $20 million in securities for the account of selling holder of security. Whereas, the Tier 2 permits for offerings of an amount up to $50 million over a 1 year time period.

For Tier 2 offerings, the proposed rules include several new requirements designed to protect those who purchase shares in those larger offerings. They include audited financial statements, which will be required of Tier 2 initial filings. In Tier 1 offerings the issuer is not required to submit audited accounts. Tier II fund raisers need to do so.

The rules allow the issuer to rely on information represented by the investor relating to compliance of requirements, unless issuer has reasonable grounds and assumptions to believe that investor’s representations and information’s is not true.

Reference List

Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 33-9497 (December 18, 2013),https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2013/33-9497.pdf

See, e.g., GAO Report to Congressional Committees, “Factors That May Affect Trends in Regulation A Offerings,” (July 2012), https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2013/33-9497.pdf

Letter from William F. Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, to the SEC dated December 18, 2013, https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-11-13/s71113-1.pdf

Letter from Rutheford B. Campbell, Jr., William L. Matthews Professor of Law, to the SEC dated November 13, 2012, http://www.sec.gov/comments/jobs-title-iv/jobstitleiv-18.pdf; Letter from Rutheford B. Campbell, Jr., William L. Matthews Professor of Law, to the SEC dated January 30, 2012, http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72301/campbel1.htm; The Wreck of Regulation D: The Unintended (and Bad) Outcomes for the SEC’s Crown Jewel Exemptions, Rutheford B. Campbell, Jr., The Business Lawyer, Vol. 66, page 919 (August 2011), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1971200

The Wreck of Regulation D, supra, at page 941.

See, e.g., Letter from A. Heath Abshure, President, North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc., to the SEC dated April 10, 2013,http://www.sec.gov/comments/jobs-title-iv/jobstitleiv-25.pdf

The only Congressional testimony reflected on the SEC’s website, http://www.sec.gov, relating to the JOBS Act, was on December 1, 2011, Testimony on “Spurring Job Growth Through Capital Formation While Protecting Investors”, before the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Meredith B. Cross, Director, Division of Corporation Finance, and Lona Nallengara, Deputy Director, Division of Corporation Finance. However, the testimony, while addressing many of the issues ultimately addressed by the JOBS Act, took no position on these issues. http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/2011/ts120111mbc.htm

See, e.g., Remarks at FIA Futures and Options Expo, Commissioner Daniel M. Gallagher, November 6, 2013

See Remarks at the Second Annual Institute for Corporate Counsel, Daniel M. Gallagher, December 6, 2013, https://www.sec.gov/servlet/Satellite/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370540462287#.UscE-bTl-70

Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 33-9497, supra, at page 9.

Remarks by President Barack Obama at the JOBS Act Bill, signing, April 5, 2012,http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/05/remarks-president-jobs-act-bill-signing




This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news [...]

NPRAfter Outcry, Crowdfunding Site Patreon Backs Off Plan To Raise ...NPRThe popular crowdfunding service Patreon has backed off plans to change its payment structure, after widespread, vocal and passionate opposition from creators and their fans. Last week, the site announced it woul [...]

TechCrunchHow hate speech crowdfunding outfit Hatreon crept back online ...TechCrunchIf you want to make a living creating white supremacist content, you're probably not going to do it via sites like Kickstarter and Patreon, which prohibit hate speech. Fortunately there's Ha [...]

CoinDeskKickstarter ICO? Don't Count On It Says Crowdfunding Leader ...CoinDeskThe company most widely associated with crowdfunding, Brooklyn-based Kickstarter, has no plans to get into the initial coin offering (ICO) business. Coming in response to the news yesterday that compet [...]

CryptoCoinsNewsCrowdfunding Giant Indiegogo Looks to Make ICOs Mainstream ...CryptoCoinsNewsOne of the world's most popular crowdfunding platforms is getting in on the ICO game. Josiah Wilmoth on 14/12/2017. ------------------Advertisement------------------. Advertisement · Reddi [...]

ForbesCrowdfunding Do's And Dont's From iFundWomen's Karen CahnForbesDuring our conversation, she was transparent in sharing that her first software company, VProud, failed because she “did everything backwards” and spent too much time trying to perfect the product. “Pe [...]

Crowdfunding via Customers: Is This The New Startup Capital?Customer ThinkWith more and more companies in a variety of sectors developing new crowdfunding campaigns, it makes sense to ask whether crowdfunding is likely to replace startup capital in the near future. Crowdfunding is qui [...]

VentureBeatAtaribox hits the pause button on its crowdfunding campaignVentureBeatAtari was supposed to start taking preorders along with launching its crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo today for its new Ataribox console. However, it seems to have hit an unspecified snag and in an ema [...]

Coindesk (press release) (blog)Crowdfunding Giant Indiegogo Opens to ICOs - CoinDeskCoindesk (press release) (blog)The startup revealed today that, through an existing partnership with MicroVentures, it will begin offering services to projects seek to use the blockchain funding model. [...]

TechCrunchFormer Gawker employees are crowdfunding an effort to buy Gawker.comTechCrunchWhile Univision acquired most of Gawker Media's sites last year (and renamed them as the Gizmodo Media Group), the deal didn't include Gawker itself. In fact, BuzzFeed reported last month [...]

CFB Finance


  • Crowdfunding
  • Crowdfund
  • Peer to Peer Lending
  • FinTech
  • Reg A+
  • Reg CF
  • Crowdfunding USA

Press Release

Live Crowdfunding .tv

What's Next Step in Regulation A+ JOBS ACTS Title IIII :L Interview : Steve Cinelli with Brian Korn Securities and Crowdfunding/Peer-to-Peer Lending Lawyer, Watch more video library | Conference | Interview | Campaign Showcase | Research | Education |