Harnessing power of a crowd is less taxing

I enjoy paying tax. Reassures me we live in a caring society. Puts something back in return for the good fortune I’ve had. Would happily pay much more.
Except . . . I like to know my taxes are being spent well on people who need it more than I do.
There’s no guarantee.
And not everyone shares my zeal for handing any money to governments, let alone ones with a different world view or sketchy record.

So membership of my Willing Taxpayers Afternoon Tea and Bikram Yoga Discussion Group has gone the way of public phone boxes.
With tax-paying on the nose, other budget revenues struggling and too much middle class welfare to dole out, there’s going to be less money for a caring society.
There’ll be more cases of having to ditch projects like the ones the Gillard government so laudably talks about but sometimes stumbles with.
The danger is, once the pay-less-tax mantra takes hold, we risk becoming a culture of ”keep what you have and the rest can fend for themselves”. What we need is a tax for people who don’t like paying tax or the governments that survive on tax or even the very word tax.
Luckily, we can pay less tax and still improve social programs and infrastructure.
We just need community spirit, a tad less self-indulgence and a drive to put your money where your mouth is.
This Clayton’s ”tax when you’re not having a tax” is called crowd-funding.
It’s an old trick – like passing round the plate or a school raffle – but it uses that worldwide internet thingo the young ‘uns talk about. If you want a project funded, you set a target sum, ask for donations via a crowd-funding site, and donors pay up only when the target is reached.
Crowd-funding raised an estimated $US3 billion last year globally through almost 500 ”platforms” and is spreading into new areas.
There’s no reason it can’t replace taxes as the source of funds for some government-run policies – especially innovative ones that scare risk-averse politicians.
Unlike the tax on bank deposits to bail out Cyprus, crowd-funding is voluntary.
One devotee is social media guru Jordan Raynor, who spruiked at a TED (Technology, Education and Design) conference recently. He calls crowd-funding the ”democratisation of philanthropy”.
Readers of good repute would have noticed the Herald editorial last week proposed crowd-funding to finance the morphing of the Art Gallery of NSW into the ”Sydney Modern” – assuming trustee Steven Lowy is a bit short of cash. Sydneysiders might donate a few dollars in return for, say, discounted entry or a brick in the new wing.
Others would have seen how ”marshmallows” – fans of the cult US TV series Veronica Mars – used crowd-funding to raise $2 million-plus in 10 hours to fund a movie version of the show.
Australians dug deep to help fund movie animation short A Cautionary Tale, while myriad bands, painters and festivals have raised the odd thousand. Wineries and citizen journalists have as well.
President Barack Obama even had Congress pass a crowd-funding law – the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or JOBS Act. (It’s awaiting regulatory safeguards. The watchdog here is also alert to investor risk as crowd-funding expands into equity raisings.)
The Gillard government is also on board, offering last week to go 50:50 with crowd-funders of certain cultural projects.
Crowd-funding’s real potential as a tax alternative, though, began through social justice and social enterprise programs. These have been worthy causes or programs too small, risky or politically uncouth to attract traditional funding.
But why stop there?
Faced with shrinking budgets but growing social need – thanks to a new government or otherwise – crowd-funding offers an egalitarian version of public-private partnership, with investors – you and I – wanting little or nothing in return.
Raynor cites a crowd-funded bridge in Rotterdam.
But any new infrastructure project with a public benefit outweighing any short-term private return is a crowd-funding candidate.
Likewise, democratic philanthropic foundations to fund scholarships, medical research and social justice projects: created by millions, not rich individuals.
The visionary things like Gonski are a big ask but not out of reach.
At $6 billion a year, that’s $6000 from 1 million of us – and that’s without any of his money!
If 10 million of us each paid $600, then it’s done for a year. For $1200 you get two years. Then assess whether it’s worthy of tax dollars.
With a government safety net, crowd-funding can also support public programs targeted for closure, buying them time to find a better business model.
It’s a way to empower people to own solutions and share the load; to lock in the feeling we live in a society that cares. Just like paying taxes once did.
Such is life …

Source: National Times – Alan Stokes

HEADLINE NEWS

This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news [...]

NPRAfter Outcry, Crowdfunding Site Patreon Backs Off Plan To Raise ...NPRThe popular crowdfunding service Patreon has backed off plans to change its payment structure, after widespread, vocal and passionate opposition from creators and their fans. Last week, the site announced it woul [...]

TechCrunchHow hate speech crowdfunding outfit Hatreon crept back online ...TechCrunchIf you want to make a living creating white supremacist content, you're probably not going to do it via sites like Kickstarter and Patreon, which prohibit hate speech. Fortunately there's Ha [...]

EntrepreneurWhy Some Small Business Owners Are Turning to Crowdfunding to Save Their CompanyEntrepreneurMany owners of beloved local businesses, especially in pricier cities, have been forced to swallow their pride and appeal to their customers in times of crisis -- a process streamli [...]

CoinDeskKickstarter ICO? Don't Count On It Says Crowdfunding Leader ...CoinDeskThe company most widely associated with crowdfunding, Brooklyn-based Kickstarter, has no plans to get into the initial coin offering (ICO) business. Coming in response to the news yesterday that compet [...]

ForbesCrowdfunding Do's And Dont's From iFundWomen's Karen CahnForbesDuring our conversation, she was transparent in sharing that her first software company, VProud, failed because she “did everything backwards” and spent too much time trying to perfect the product. “Pe [...]

CryptoCoinsNewsCrowdfunding Giant Indiegogo Looks to Make ICOs MainstreamCryptoCoinsNewsCrowdfunding platform Indiegogo has a plan to help initial coin offerings (ICOs) break into the mainstream, even as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is ramping up its oversight of [...]

BBC NewsWu Yongning: Who is to blame for a daredevil's death? - BBC NewsBBC NewsLast month, Wu Yongning went out to do what he loved best - scale a skyscraper without safety equipment and film himself dangling off its roof by his fingertips. What happened next almost seems inevit [...]

TechCrunchFormer Gawker employees are crowdfunding an effort to buy Gawker.comTechCrunchWhile Univision acquired most of Gawker Media's sites last year (and renamed them as the Gizmodo Media Group), the deal didn't include Gawker itself. In fact, BuzzFeed reported last month [...]

NPRCrowdfunding For French CastlesNPRYou too can own a French chateau, in part, anyway. Romain Delaume, CEO of Dartagnans, tells NPR's Scott Simon about a crowdfunding effort underway to preserve La Mothe-Chandeniers. SCOTT SIMON, HOST: What if I told you that for about $60, you [...]

CFB Finance

Marketwired

  • Crowdfunding
  • Crowdfund
  • Peer to Peer Lending
  • FinTech
  • Reg A+
  • Reg CF
  • Crowdfunding USA

Press Release

Live Crowdfunding .tv

What's Next Step in Regulation A+ JOBS ACTS Title IIII :L Interview : Steve Cinelli with Brian Korn Securities and Crowdfunding/Peer-to-Peer Lending Lawyer, Watch more video library | Conference | Interview | Campaign Showcase | Research | Education |