REG D, RULE 506(C), REG A+ & CROWDFUNDING | Powerful Tools to Raise Big Money


A+On June 19, 2015, the SEC will fully adopt Title IV of the JOBS Act, with the objective of facilitating easier access to private capital formation for small companies. Regulation A+ updates and expands on the former Regulation A exemption for unregistered public offerings, which previously had a $5 million annual cap, and carves out two new sets of rules, Tier 1 and Tier 2, (which the SEC collectively calls Regulation A+), with annual limits of $20 million and $50 million, respectively, that small securities issuers can legally use to advertise and raise capital from private investors. (The term “issuer” refers to a legal entity … that develops, registers and sells securities to the investing public in order to finance its own operations.

In September 2013 the SEC authorized advertising to accredited investors under a new Regulation D, Rule 506(c) exemption pursuant to Title II of the JOBS Act. (Per Rule 501, an accredited investor is an investor who earns a minimum of $200,000 a year as a single person; earns a minimum of $300,000 a year as a married couple; or has a minimum net worth of $1 million—exclusive of equity in their primary residence.) However, because it is estimated that only 10 percent of all investors in the U.S. are accredited, even with the ability to advertise, many issuers found themselves hitting a wall when it came to raising private money, and many otherwise-qualified investors were left out in the cold.

Regulation A+ seeks to solve that problem by allowing advertising of securities offerings to the general public with a streamlined pre-approval process. Under Tier I, anyone can invest, with no financial limitations. Under Tier II, anyone can invest up to 10 percent of his or her net worth or 10 percent of his or her gross annual income (whichever is greater). This opens up a new audience for issuers who can’t access enough accredited investors to fund their deals, and who already know a lot of unaccredited (and deserving) investors who would like to invest with them.


Real estate entrepreneurs commonly raise money from private investors in exchange for “promissory notes” or “investment contracts”, both of which fall within state and federal definitions of “securities”. An “investment contract” is an investment of money in a common enterprise with an expectation of profits based solely on the efforts of the promoter. SEC v. W. J. Howey Co. 328 U.S. 293 (1946). Under The Securities Act of 1933, all offers and sales of securities must be “registered” (pre-approved) unless exempt from registration. Serial borrowers whose business depends on repeatedly issuing promissory notes to private lenders, and investors who sell passive investment opportunities to private investors, must qualify for an exemption (by following a specific set of rules) unless they obtain pre-approval from securities regulators to sell the securities in a public offering.

Typically, small, private companies and real estate syndicators had to rely on exemptions under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. Most Regulation D rules (called private placement offerings) prohibit general solicitation; restrict offers or sales to investors who meet certain financial qualifications, and some rules (Rule 504 and 505) limit the dollar amounts that can be raised.


Under Regulation D, Rule 506(c), issuers can advertise their investment opportunities to the public, and there is no dollar limit, but they are limited to accepting funds from accredited investors (as defined under Rule 501). Under 506(c), accreditation must be verified by tax return or income review, or through third-party verification. This requirement has proven to be burdensome to issuers.

Regulation A, pre-JOBS Act, was the only federal securities exemption that allowed issuers to raise money from unaccredited investors using general solicitation. However, the original Regulation A was not a popular choice, as it only allowed an issuer to raise up to $5 million in a 12-month period and required state pre-approval prior to advertising; and the legal and filing costs were prohibitive for such a small offering. An issuer who was lucky enough to find an affordable attorney to take on his or her project would find that the approval process could be challenging, time-consuming and often delayed by both the SEC and the state securities agencies. For many, the ability to advertise wasn’t worth the effort, and they would instead fall back on the federal Regulation D and its restrictions or confine their offerings to a single state so they could operate under state exemptions (often limited to $1 million). Of the Regulation A offerings filed between 2008 and 2013, Jillian Sidoti filed 40% of the real estate related filings and she filed the only Reg A real-estate related filing that was approved by the SEC in 2011.

The adoption of Regulation A+ will alleviate many of these issues. Furthermore, because of the new popularity of Regulation A+ among both issuers and attorneys, there will be increased regulator experience with these types of filings at the federal and state levels, hopefully providing a more streamlined and less burdensome process.

Regulation A+, TIER 1

Regulation A+, Tier 1 is an amended version of the former Regulation A. Tier 1 issuers may now raise up to $20 million as opposed to the old $5 million limit. It is also expected that Tier 1 offerings will be eligible for filing through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system, which was previously unavailable and required voluminous paper filings. By being able to file Tier 1 offerings electronically, issuers will be able to see their uploaded filings in real time.

Tier 1 does not have any audit requirements. This is great for those issuers looking to save on audit and accounting costs as audits can be expensive, but the tradeoff is that audits give investors peace of mind and a sense of transparency. Further, Tier 1 issuers must still get state pre-approval of the offering before they are allowed to advertise. This means that in order to sell its securities, a Tier 1 company must subject itself to the scrutiny of every state where it intends to sell securities. The review fees for such states could potentially exceed the cost of an audit. (Filing fees vary from state to state from as little as $100 to as much as $5,000.)

Regulation A+, TIER 2

The new Regulation A, Tier 2, will allow issuers who meet certain requirements to raise up to $50 million in a 12-month period. Tier 2, like Tier 1, will allow for uploading of filings to the EDGAR system and general solicitation. Tier 2 issuers will be required to perform an audit prior to approval and for a minimum of three years following approval. The Tier 2 issuer must also hire a transfer agent (qualifications to be determined) and meet certain ongoing reporting requirements similar to a public “smaller reporting company,” including annual, semiannual and current event reports.

Despite the audit and additional filing requirements, Tier 2 pre-empts the state pre-approval requirements under Tier 1, making Tier 2 a more appealing option for those who wish to raise money from investors in multiple states. The notice requirements required by the states are expected to be similar to a Form D filing under Regulation D.

Both Tier 1 and Tier 2 issuers will be able to enjoy the benefits of “testing the waters.” Issuers will be able to file advertising materials to be used to gauge interest prior to approval of the offering. This is helpful for figuring out what to offer investors, what would be of interest to investors and to build a prospective investor list. They simply can’t collect any money until the offering has been approved.


Crowdfunding is the latest buzzword in capital raising since enactment of the federal JOBS Act in April of 2012. The word “Crowdfunding” has become a generic term used to describe advertising for investors authorized under various sections of the JOBS Act.

Although Crowdfunding was allowed pre-JOBS Act, but only for not-for-profit ventures. Pre-JOBS Act, for-profit companies could not advertise for investors unless they had an approved intra-state offering (with all investors, assets, and issuer in one state), an SEC-approved Regulation A offering or a public offering.

Title II of the JOBS Act directed the SEC to draft regulations allowing advertising of offerings limited to accredited investors, which resulted in the SEC’s adoption of Regulation D, Rule 506(c) in September 2013. After adoption, the media and capital-raising marketplace quickly adopted the term Crowdfunding to apply to advertising of such offerings.

Title III of the JOBS Act authorized the SEC to draft regulations for a new “Crowdfunding exemption” that would allow issuers to raise up to $1,000,000/year, in offerings that could be advertised and sold via SEC-approved “Funding Portals”, where anyone could invest up to $2,000 or up to a maximum of 10% of their annual income of net worth (subject to certain limitations). In its proposed regulations for Title III, SEC introduced the term “Regulation Crowdfunding”, to differentiate Title III offerings from the media’s generic use of the term. Unfortunately, the proposed rules for Regulation Crowdfunding appear to have fallen into a regulatory quagmire, with dissent between FINRA (the self-regulatory organization for licensed securities broker/dealers), the SEC, and state securities regulators as to their final form. Until the final rules are adopted, if ever, Regulation Crowdfunding under the Title III Crowdfunding exemption described in the JOBS Act is still illegal.

Now, with the adoption of the new Regulation A+ offering rules under Title IV of the JOBS Act, advertising of Regulation A+ offerings are also being lumped in with the generic use of the term ‘Crowdfunding’.

To further confound matters, many “Crowdfunding Platforms” have arisen whose purpose is to advertise eligible Rule 506(c) and Regulation A+ offerings. These Crowdfunding Platforms are of four primary types; 1) securities broker-dealers who advertise eligible offerings to their prequalified investors; 2) registered investment advisers who participate and/or recommend eligible offerings to their clients; 3) Crowdfunding platforms who advertise eligible offerings to their database of investors for a marketing fee and/or back-end profits; and 4) the issuer’s own website. Crowdfunding Platforms merely provide a means for an issuer to advertise an existingoffering, meaning an issuer must already have an offering under Rule 506(c) or Regulation A+ offering in-hand before a Crowdfunding Platform can promote it to their investors.

So, although it is true that issuers can now advertise their offerings to investors under federal law, currently under Rule 506(c), and later under Regulation A+ (once an issuer’s specific offering has been approved), the new rules are not a wholesale license for everyone to advertise real estate investment opportunities to anyone at anytime. There are legal requirements for both Rule 506(c) and Regulation A offerings that must be met; the proper disclosure documents and investor agreements must be drafted; and regulatory filings must be submitted to the SEC and state regulators; and in the case of Regulation A+, the offering must be pre-approved before funds can be collected. Only then can an issuer advertise and collect money from investors, subject to applicable investor verifications, limitations, and reporting requirements.

The Bottom line: Regulation A filers will be able to enjoy the perks of Crowdfunding, such as using a Crowdfunding Platform to advertise and sell their securities, or to advertise their offering on their own website. Unlike Rule 506(c) filers however, Regulation A filers will not be restricted to accredited investors. Tier I offerings will be subject to SEC and state pre-approval, but no audits. Tier II offerings will be subject to SEC approval and state notice filings, ongoing filing and annual audit requirements. Regulation A+ is not for the part-time entrepreneur, but those who are serious about raising money, want to reach a wider audience, and plan to be in this business for the long-haul would be well-served to explore their options with a securities law firm that has significant experience with Regulation D and Regulation A, and can guide them through the process.

Is Regulation A+ the right choice for all issuers? No, but it is ideal for seasoned issuers who have already had a number of private placement offerings and/or those who are ready to take their real estate investment companies public, and who have time to wait before they need to start raising money. Due to the anticipated 6-month+ timeframe for approving Regulation A+ offerings, this isn’t a good choice for someone with a property under contract and a 90-day closing date, but it can be an excellent choice for hard money lenders, serial borrowers, fix and flippers, or commercial investors with track records who want to raise money to buy multiple properties under a single offering or “blind pool” scenario.

Below are some highlights of the differences between Regulation D, Rule 506 and Regulation A+:

Description Reg D, Rule 506(b) Reg D, Rule 506(c) Reg A
(Tier 1)
Reg A
(Tier 2)
Dollar Limit None None ≤ $5MM limit/12 Months ≤ $50MM/12 Months
Advertising No, pre-existing relationship required Yes Yes Yes
Suitability Standards Unlimited Accredited; up to 35 Sophisticated; Pre-existing relationship; Investors self-certify Verified Accredited Investors only No or limited suitability requirements Unlimited Accredited; Unaccredited limited to investing the greater of 10% of net worth or gross income
SEC Pre-Approval None None Yes, estimated ≥ 6 months Yes, estimated ≥ 6 months
State Pre-Approval None; File Notices None; File Notices Yes; Timing unknown None; File Notices (like 506)
Audit Required No No No Yes
Reporting No ongoing reporting No ongoing reporting No ongoing reporting Ongoing annual, semi-annual and current event reports
Resales Allowed No No Yes, but limited Yes, but limited

Source :

This article by attorney Kim Lisa Taylor she explains the difference between powerful tools to raise big money: REG D, RULE 506(C), REG A+ & CROWDFUNDING

On October 26th, a group of industry participants will be gathering at the 4thGlobal Crowdfunding Convention Bootcamp in Las Vegas  our Sponsor Synidicated Lawyers  leading the country in this new exciting securities offering.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


BloombergCouples Desperate For Children Turn to Crowdfunding FertilityBloombergCrowdfunding has become a popular mechanism for many couples who can't afford the high costs of IVF, or adoption and surrogacy. “It's not an easy thing to share publicly,” says Crystal Barrett, 33 [...]

MarketWatchWhy a crowdfunding site is giving out $10000 scholarshipsMarketWatchCrowdfunding site GoFundMe announced Thursday that it will award $10,000 to 10 students with pages on their site that fundraise for education. The award is part of a contest the site held throughout Septemb [...]

Huffington PostReal Estate Crowdfunding's Pathway of ChangeHuffington Post“Crowdfunding is just the Internet,” stated Attorney Mark Roderick as he opened last month's RealCap Chicago. RealCap is an annual conference that joins crowdfunding leaders and innovators to propel th [...]

Smart From The Start: 3 Ways To Properly Establish Your Business When CrowdfundingCBS LocalConsequently, burgeoning entrepreneurs have turned to crowdfunding platforms to get the seed money they need to get business ideas off the ground. However, seeing as 98 percent of crowdfunding p [...]

Crowdfund InsiderOn Investment Crowdfunding, Diversification & the Wisdom of the ...Crowdfund InsiderStill Time to Fix the Fix Crowdfunding Act One of the cardinal rules of investing is diversification - a critical ingredient for long-term portfolio growt.and more » [...]

ExtremeTechNew crowdfunding project promises an ATX motherboard for IBM's Power8ExtremeTechWe don't cover many crowdfunding projects at ExtremeTech, because most of the pitches we get are frankly terrible. While we can't make any promises about any crowdfunding project [...]

CoinTelegraphCrowdfunding vs. ICO: Experts Question Legitimacy and Guarantees of Initial Coin OfferingsCoinTelegraphOne major difference exists between traditional crowdfunding methods and ICO, and that is market value. When a product is introduced on crowdfunding platforms like Indie [...]

EntrepreneurIs Crowdfunding Right for You? Answer These 7 Questions to Find ...EntrepreneurLess than a third of crowdfunding campaigns reach their financial goals. Will yours be one of them?and more » [...]

MedCity NewsMedical device entrepreneur's crowdfunding campaign seeks to make vision for infusion catheter a realityMedCity NewsThe entrepreneur behind a revolutionary cancer technology is taking the unusual approach of using crowdfunding to raise $500,000 in a bid to get the dev [...]

Commercial Property ExecutiveCrowdfunding in the Investment MainstreamCommercial Property Executivebryan-hancock-redo-190x190 As I watch the crowdfunding industry play out, I am reminded of an old Bruce Lee quote about water slowing as it makes its way through cracks. Technology has a [...]

CFB Finance

Press Release

Live Crowdfunding .tv

What's Next Step in Regulation A+ JOBS ACTS Title IIII :L Interview : Steve Cinelli with Brian Korn Securities and Crowdfunding/Peer-to-Peer Lending Lawyer, Watch more video library | Conference | Interview | Campaign Showcase | Research | Education |