Crowdfunding: do the famous and talented deserve our financial support?

kickstarter-logo-k-colorSpike Lee and Zach Braff are amongst those who are raising funds on sites such as Kickstarter. But aren’t there other more pressing charity cases to give to?

You could be forgiven for thinking that artists are society’s most pressing charity cases.

Film-makers, musicians, performers and other creatives have rushed to embrace crowd funding on US-based websites KickstarterIndiegogo and their Australian equivalent, Pozible. On Twitter and Facebook, they hassle friends and fans to donate to their latest enterprise in return for token rewards such as postcards and stickers. And those soliciting money aren’t just bohemians starving in garrets – many of them are well-known names.

In the US, film director Spike Lee has so far raised nearly $1m on Kickstarter to make a new movie, while James Franco recently raised $320,000 on Indiegogo to produce a trilogy of films based on his book. Marina Abramović has attracted over $280,000 in pledges to fund her eponymous institute for performance art (with a little help from Lady Gaga, who contributed a promotional video of herself cavorting naked with a giant crystal). Last year, singer Amanda Palmer famously raised $1.2m to fund her solo album. Their efforts pale beside the $3.1m raised by Zach Braff to make a follow-up to Garden State.

The latest high-profile figure to jump on board the crowd funding bandwagon is one of Australia’s most renowned theatre companies. Belvoir, which has nurtured such luminaries as Geoffrey Rush and Cate Blanchett, launched a crowd funding campaign on Pozible last week. In its whimsically worded campaign page, the company is seeking $10,000 from supporters to “help Peter Pan fly” and send its production of the J M Barrie play to New York City.

As with other recent crowd funding campaigns launched by big names, the move has attracted controversy. Belvoir received nearly $2m last year in government funding and noted in its latest annual report that it has been “performing well financially”. According to some in the arts community, thriving enterprises such as Belvoir shouldn’t be using their reputation to raise crowd-sourced money that is better spent on struggling grass-roots artists.

That may be so – but I think there’s a more fundamental concern. The theatre’s general manager has asked the federal arts minister to retweet its appeal “for a good cause”. But is it, really, such a good cause? I think that likening a Broadway show to a charity is a kind of category error.

On its Pozible campaign page, Belvoir provides a familiar list of suggested donation levels and what each gift achieves. For example, $50 will pay for an actor to catch a taxi from JFK airport to Manhattan. By comparison, a donation of $50 can buy 15 insecticide-treated mosquito nets for some of the world’s poorest children in malaria-prone parts of Africa. Preventing malaria is less glamorous than putting on a show for the kids of Manhattan, but it makes a far greater impact. Indeed, it has been shown to be one of the most cost-effective ways to save a person’s life.

Suggesting that charitable giving should be as effective as possible isn’t a novel argument. It’s the central tenet of the effective altruism movement being led by philosopher Peter Singer and groups such as Oxford-based society Giving What We Can. The idea is that our giving should be informed by solid evidence of its impact on others, not by the emotions we feel towards the cause.

Robert Wiblin, research director for Giving What We Can, says it would be “tragic” if crowd funding unintentionally shifted people’s donations away from those in severe poverty. “I would encourage people to budget for this kind of thing separately from what they give to really help others, which usually requires looking at the developing world,” he says.

The point isn’t that we shouldn’t support new plays, films or albums by talented artists; we should. But we need to ensure that financing creative ventures doesn’t become a substitute for proven interventions to help the world’s poorest. Crowd funding isn’t a shiny new 21st century form of almsgiving, which traditionally has focused on the needy – not the famous, beautiful and talented.

What’s more, using our charitable spend to make a difference to those who need it most could be better for us, too. A study published earlier this year found that giving to causes that make a clear impact on others leaves us happier than supporting charities which offer nebulous benefits.

In its marketing copy, Belvoir writes: “You will sleep well at night knowing you have helped us make some magic on Broadway.” I think most of us would sleep even better knowing our donation has, almost certainly, helped to save a child’s life.

[Source: Chris Rodney @ The Guardian UK]

Tags: , , , , , , ,


AZCentral.comTiny companies lure investors under Arizona crowdfunding lawAZCentral.comInvestors who make bets under the state's one-year-old crowdfunding law certainly have the potential to get in on the ground floor, but they must be patient and might not receive any returns. Th [...]

BloombergCouples Desperate For Children Turn to Crowdfunding FertilityBloombergCrowdfunding has become a popular mechanism for many couples who can't afford the high costs of IVF, or adoption and surrogacy. “It's not an easy thing to share publicly,” says Crystal Barrett, 33 [...]

BBC NewsNHS trust 'relies' on crowdfunding to equip wardBBC NewsAn NHS trust has launched a crowdfunding appeal to buy equipment for a new hospital unit because "it cannot get started without donations". The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH) in Stanmore, n [...]

MarketWatchWhy a crowdfunding site is giving out $10,000 scholarships ...MarketWatchIt's another indication that families are struggling with college costs.and more » [...]

Huffington PostReal Estate Crowdfunding's Pathway of ChangeHuffington Post“Crowdfunding is just the Internet,” stated Attorney Mark Roderick as he opened last month's RealCap Chicago. RealCap is an annual conference that joins crowdfunding leaders and innovators to propel th [...]

MottoIVF: More Couples Crowdfunding to Pay for Procedure - MottoMottoMore and more couples are turning to crowdfunding to fund costly in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments, Bloomberg reports.More Couples Who Can't Afford IVF Are Turning To Crowdfunding ...RomperCouples desperat [...]

WestwordProgressive-Rock Band Marillion Pioneered CrowdfundingWestwordThat was the beginning of crowdfunding for us — and for every band, really.” When it came time for the recording and release of the followup to the 1999 record, Kelly and the band realized that one of [...]

Boing BoingCrowdfunding a bike-lock that squirts vomit-inducing antipersonnel gas when cutBoing BoingThe Skunklock is a $109 crowdfunded gadget that contains pressurized vomit-inducing gas the creators call "Formula D_1," and which is intended to induce immediate vomiting wh [...]

EntrepreneurIs Crowdfunding Right for You? Answer These 7 Questions to Find ...EntrepreneurLess than a third of crowdfunding campaigns reach their financial goals. Will yours be one of them?and more » [...]

CoinTelegraphCrowdfunding vs. ICO: Experts Question Legitimacy and Guarantees ...CoinTelegraphThe simplistic idea behind crowdfunding a non-existent software or system has become a trend in the cryptocurrency industry, but most Bitcoin experts are highly ...and more » [...]

CFB Finance

Press Release

CrowdFund Beat News

Thanks @inmocrowd @crowdfundingusa @DuaneDDrew for being top engaged community members this week :) >> Want this 🆓?…

Live Crowdfunding .tv

What's Next Step in Regulation A+ JOBS ACTS Title IIII :L Interview : Steve Cinelli with Brian Korn Securities and Crowdfunding/Peer-to-Peer Lending Lawyer, Watch more video library | Conference | Interview | Campaign Showcase | Research | Education |